Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Yuzhny Rabochy


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was withdrawn. (non-admin closure)  Dr Strauss   talk   20:23, 1 October 2017 (UTC)

Yuzhny Rabochy

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Article is entirely copy-pasted from its main source but is ineligible for G12 as the content is licensed under GNU. However, the group has received little coverage elsewhere with nothing that confers general notability. A search for offline sources on WorldCat shows no in-depth coverage.  Dr Strauss   talk   18:35, 29 September 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: PROD removed by another user with the extremely convincing rationale of Highly unlikely that a 20th-century subject will have sources online, therefore controversial. I guess that's why similar political movements like National Bolshevik Front and National_Bolshevik_Party have no online sou- oh wait...   Dr Strauss   talk   18:43, 29 September 2017 (UTC)
 * Keep. A quick googling will reveal that there are plenty of potential references. "After the First Party Congress, with the publication in Ekater inoslav of Iuzhnyi rabochi i [Southern Worker] -- a serious competitor to Iskra [Spark] as the party's leading organ -- Ekater inoslav attracted Social Democrats from all over Russia." ( p. 219) --Soman (talk) 23:05, 29 September 2017 (UTC)
 * Keep on the basis of sources mentioned. (this particular party was formed in 1899 and continued until 1903,, considerably before the online era. The 20th century covered quite a long period.   DGG ( talk ) 01:06, 30 September 2017 (UTC)
 * Keep. I would have thought that it was pretty obvious that web sites aren't the best place to look for sources for a publication that folded in 1903, and that a Roman alphabet transliteration of a Russian title will not be likely to be the best spelling to use when looking for sources. Plenty of reliable sources in English can be found by this search and the first source cited in the Russian Wikipedia article is an entry for this in the Great Soviet Encyclopedia. 86.17.222.157 (talk) 14:50, 30 September 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 13:26, 1 October 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politics-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 13:26, 1 October 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Russia-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 13:26, 1 October 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of History-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 13:27, 1 October 2017 (UTC)


 * Keep - Source given by Soman, ip seem sufficient for WP:V, etc. Smmurphy(Talk) 15:40, 1 October 2017 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.