Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Yves Chaudron


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   speedy keep; nomination has been withdrawn and there are no outstanding delete !votes. Non-admin closure. &mdash; KuyaBriBri Talk 19:42, 6 June 2013 (UTC)

Yves Chaudron

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Unsourced article with possibly no notability TheOriginalSoni (talk) 01:08, 6 June 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of France-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:41, 6 June 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Visual arts-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:41, 6 June 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Crime-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:41, 6 June 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:41, 6 June 2013 (UTC)


 * Keep, per that pretty "Find sources" line. Dea  db  eef  05:24, 6 June 2013 (UTC)


 * Speedy keep - per WP:BEFORE. I've just added a bunch of sources and information. The guy has been the subject of a large number of books and news articles and probably passes WP:ARTIST points 1 and 3, simply of the basis of his significant works of art - 6 carbon copies of the Mona Lisa impressive enough to fool a bunch of people and sell for $300k a piece (in 1911; millions in today's money). Stalwart 111  06:25, 6 June 2013 (UTC)
 * Keep - Should not have been tagged for deletion, just cleanup; which has been well-done.FigureArtist (talk) 13:25, 6 June 2013 (UTC)


 * Withdrawing the nomination per my Talk Page discussion. For a topic this important/interesting, it's definitely surprising that both the English and the French articles would be stubs, which led me to consider the possiblity that the article was a hoax or an urban legend created by sub-par sources. I no longer think that this article should be deleted — Preceding unsigned comment added by TheOriginalSoni (talk • contribs) 6 June 2013
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.