Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Yvette Long


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. S warm  ♠  19:30, 8 August 2015 (UTC)

Yvette Long

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Person seems not notable, only some primary sources are given. Article is not well written. Seems like promotion.  Human 3015   Send WikiLove   21:17, 1 August 2015 (UTC)


 * Delete, no RS, highly promotional.Pincrete (talk) 00:24, 2 August 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete, promotional article. May be a copyvio as well, there is a lot of close paraphrasing, for example Yvette Long and . Daß Wölf (talk) 02:07, 2 August 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of New Jersey-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 21:42, 2 August 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 21:42, 2 August 2015 (UTC)


 * Weak Delete - while I haven't looked into whether if this is a copyvio, or the notability of the subject at hand (hence the weak); the article definitely takes a promotional tone. WP:NOTPROMOTION. — Godsy (TALK CONT ) 04:47, 3 August 2015 (UTC)
 * Weak keep. There is some in-depth coverage here in which she won an award from the state of New Jersey, plus a nice write-up here although it was in a local paper, plus she's included in Psychology Today as a therapist here, and she is one of those excellent people really making a difference in the world. However, the strength of the sources is not that great, unfortunately. So I am on the fence on this one, maybe slightly in the keep side.--Tomwsulcer (talk) 17:25, 5 August 2015 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.