Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Z-5500


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. King of &hearts;   &diams;   &clubs;  &spades; 04:40, 13 October 2011 (UTC)

Z-5500

 * – ( View AfD View log )


 * Delete. Non-notable product. -- Alan Liefting (talk) - 06:16, 21 September 2011 (UTC)
 * Keep&mdash;Reviewed by Maximum PC, Windows Vista, and covered by several books including Building the perfect PC and Leo Laporte's 2006 Gadget Guide. Also reviewed on several web hardware review sites. Regards, RJH (talk) 16:39, 21 September 2011 (UTC)
 * Do multiple reviews establish notability? I don't think so. See WP:PRODUCT. -- Alan Liefting (talk) - 18:20, 2 October 2011 (UTC)


 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions.  — • Gene93k (talk) 21:50, 21 September 2011 (UTC)


 * Keep&mdash;Alan Liefting is just jelly because he doesn't have one. I have one and I am sure its bass can pound Alan so hard in his face that he wouldn't be able to finish those words he just mentioned before he is knock down to the ground. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 58.64.251.110 (talk • contribs) 06:43, 22 September 2011
 * You comments are not relevant in an AfD, besides, I don't have an iPad, a Ferrari or the Mona Lisa but I am not putting them up for deletion. As someone who generally eschews the consumer lifestyle I don't get jealous about the possessions that others own. -- Alan Liefting (talk) - 20:40, 1 October 2011 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, King of &hearts;   &diams;   &clubs;  &spades; 03:50, 28 September 2011 (UTC)

 
 * Keep - multiple reviews in magazines (in fact, more than RJH listed) and coverage in books. I would say notable (even though I don't own one). Moswento (talk | contribs) 10:32, 28 September 2011 (UTC)
 * Do multiple reviews establish notability? I don't think so. See WP:PRODUCT. -- Alan Liefting (talk) - 18:20, 2 October 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete. Un-notable consumer product; not the first, biggest, best, last, most dangerous, etc., just another shelf-filler. Wikipedia is not Consumer Reports and next year it will be replaced by the Z-5600. No encyclopediac value to a paraphrase of the advertising brochure. Reviews in magazines are just another form of advertising; of course there's lots of them, that's what the manufacturer's PR department is paid to do. --Wtshymanski (talk) 13:50, 28 September 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete since Wikipedia is not a directory of every consumer product ever offered for sale, and per Wtshymanski Non-notable product. Edison (talk) 20:30, 28 September 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete - article smacks of promotion and/or "how-to" in places. Fails the GNG. - The Bushranger One ping only 00:26, 5 October 2011 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, The Bushranger One ping only 05:33, 5 October 2011 (UTC)


 * Refreshing my deletion comment - We've already zapped a couple of other speaker articles, yes, I know otherstuffexists. But the argument for this one is no better than for the others, and it's only because we haven't had more people chime in that we've had to relist this *twice*. --Wtshymanski (talk) 14:05, 7 October 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete. Just another product on the shelf. Almost every product gets reviewed, so product reviews don't proof notability. -- P 1 9 9 • TALK 12:33, 12 October 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.