Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Z.E.B.R.A.


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result wasspeedy deleted by per WP:CSD. Non-admin closure. --Dhartung | Talk 06:12, 20 December 2007 (UTC)

Z.E.B.R.A.

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

Speedy was originally proposed, but the original editor said "Its qualified under fiction but sources and citations will be posted soon." None of the sources make clear what fiction universe this group is from. Accordingly, this is a non-notable fictional group with no sources to verify its existence. Without knowing whose works this group appears in, it's not even possible to redirect it to the article on the book series, etc. —C.Fred (talk) 22:31, 19 December 2007 (UTC)


 * I concur wholeheartedly. This may someday fall under the guises of an aspect of notable fiction, but as it stands currently, no. Mhudson3 (talk) 22:44, 19 December 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete possible speedy. It is fictional but not so that it would qualify for an article. The article concludes "All information provided by Z.E.B.R.A. members Chris DeCastro, Brian Long, and Lucas Sullivan" so definitely original research. Capitalistroadster (talk) 22:50, 19 December 2007 (UTC)
 * It's just hoax vandalism. The article claims that Ghostbusters was a documentary about ghosts in America, for starters.  Delete. Uncle G (talk) 23:57, 19 December 2007 (UTC)
 * This article is not a hoax. I'm Pete McDonald one of the legendary brothers. Every word of this is the truth. Its called an underground society, jeez read a book one in a while. —Preceding unsigned comment added by  76.117.218.68 (talk • contribs) 00:28, 20 December 2007 (UTC)
 * If it's a real society, then it needs reliable sources to back it up, or it can be speedy deleted as a non-notable real group. Members of the group writing about themselves do not count; that qualifies as original research. —C.Fred (talk) 00:47, 20 December 2007 (UTC)


 * Delete as hoax and WP:NOTE. I suggest moving this to Uncyclopedia where it would be more appreciated.-- Lenticel ( talk ) 03:25, 20 December 2007 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete as patent nonsense and don't feel the trolls.-h i s  s p a c e   r e s e a r c h 03:50, 20 December 2007 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.