Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/ZARUM


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was delete. -- ( drini's vandalproof page &#x260E;  ) 05:48, 23 November 2005 (UTC)

ZARUM
I have just reviewed the article in question having come across the deletion notice while searching for the artist. I am familiar with his works and while the other gentleman is not, this does not seem to me to be a reason to delete. This artist may not be as notable as Miro or Picasso, but is important for a new generation. A simple internet search using the main engines yields enough information and comments by others who see the importance of the artist.
 * DO NOT Delete as per nominator. Justified. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 84.110.77.250 (talk • contribs) (URL: )

Appears to be self promotion / autobiography of an artist who is not yet notable. The article provides a link to a review of a recent artshow, but this review appears to be also self authored or written by a friend. Solipsist 07:09, 15 November 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete as per nominator. Vanity.--MacRusgail 14:05, 15 November 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. Puppet vanity. Ifnord 14:47, 15 November 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete Article copied in part from artist's website -the remainder appears elsewhere on the net as a "statement from the artist".  This is clearly self-authored and non-notable.  Swegner 19:38, 15 November 2005 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.