Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/ZX8302


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Sinclair QL.  Sandstein  11:07, 30 December 2021 (UTC)

ZX8302

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

No sources, no notable articles to cite. Fails WP:GNG Swordman97  talk to me  05:37, 23 December 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions.  Swordman97  talk to me  05:37, 23 December 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete pretty clear via nom. Caleb Stanford (talk) 06:11, 23 December 2021 (UTC)


 * Comment - As a "retro chip", I find it highly likely (though not assuredly likely) that this received notable coverage in sources that are not searchable online, in particular: contemporary tech magazines. I do not currently have access to a brick and mortar library to check, however. Fieari (talk) 07:47, 23 December 2021 (UTC)
 * Comment: Chip visible on first video at about 3m 47s at . Not looking at full video though to see if mentioned elsewhere, but certainly on a least one board rev. Djm-leighpark (talk) 09:53, 24 December 2021 (UTC)
 * Redirect to Sinclair_QL, where it is mentioned. A quick WP:BEFORE style search verifies this is a real chip, a ULA designed for the the Sinclair QL computer. Per our policy WP:ATD, verifiable information should be preserved if possible, not deleted. The chip's main impact was on the Sinclair QL and it is a plausible search term, so a redirect there is warranted. -- 11:47, 24 December 2021 (UTC)
 * Redirect Per Mark viking. Note ZX8301 may be a similar case. Pavlor (talk) 08:31, 27 December 2021 (UTC)
 * Redirect, with Sinclair QL providing a good target. As notes, ZX8301 is entirely analogous. In an ideal world, we would probably have a more technical article like Sinclair QL hardware spanning the kind of content in https://web.archive.org/web/20060504000555/http://www.staff.uni-mainz.de/roklein/ql/Hardware but we are better spinning off such an article from Sinclair QL than merging the stubs. &mdash; Charles Stewart (talk) 14:20, 27 December 2021 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.