Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Zaan Khan


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete. Closing discussion as it was speedy deleted as G5. (non-admin closure) — HELL KNOWZ   ▎TALK 08:57, 1 June 2019 (UTC)

Zaan Khan

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Fails WP:NACTOR - several small roles, nothing significant to establish notability  Ravensfire  (talk) 12:43, 26 May 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions.  Ravensfire  (talk) 12:43, 26 May 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions.  Ravensfire  (talk) 12:43, 26 May 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 15:35, 26 May 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 15:35, 26 May 2019 (UTC)


 * Delete per nom. The creator's pattern of editing is a concern. Deb (talk) 08:07, 27 May 2019 (UTC)


 * Delete per non good writing style also it's locks living people biography Goodd-002  (chatme)  07:24, 28 May 2019 (UTC)
 * What does "it's locks living people biography" mean? -- Begoon 17:33, 28 May 2019 (UTC)


 * This article is about Zaan Khan, who is an Indian actor but there is a lack of Reliable sources in this article. Goodd-002  (chatme)  19:35, 28 May 2019 (UTC)
 * Was that an answer to my question? Because I still have no idea what "it's locks living people biography" means. -- Begoon 01:40, 29 May 2019 (UTC)
 * Keep Added reliable sources, did clean up — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2405:205:4223:E8B8:0:0:2373:58A0 (talk) 09:15, 28 May 2019 (UTC)
 * Delete per Deb. I share those concerns. There are a couple of dubious accounts creating very weakly sourced, poorly written, promotional articles in that particular niche topic area. Further investigation would probably be a good thing. -- Begoon 01:40, 29 May 2019 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.