Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Zaboj Harvalik


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. King of &hearts;   &diams;   &clubs;  &spades; 00:50, 12 August 2010 (UTC)

Zaboj Harvalik

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  )

Non notable person, no refs. Was prodded ~2 years ago, and got deprodded earlier today. Going full AfD this time. Headbomb {talk / contribs / physics / books} 04:29, 5 August 2010 (UTC)
 * This AfD nomination was incomplete (missing step 3). It is listed now. DumbBOT (talk) 15:03, 5 August 2010 (UTC)


 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Science-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 17:31, 5 August 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 17:31, 5 August 2010 (UTC)


 * Delete unless the prod contester has in depth independent sources describing the topic in depth that I am not finding. The article was deleted via prod, but only recently restored - it has not been sitting in article space with a prod tag for two years. - 2/0 (cont.) 05:27, 6 August 2010 (UTC)


 * Delete. No evidence of notability. -- Radagast 3 (talk) 08:44, 6 August 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete. Per WP:FRINGE it is especially important to have reliable sources for subjects such as this, to prevent Wikipedia itself becoming the main source of information on the subject, and in this case we have none. —David Eppstein (talk) 04:20, 8 August 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.