Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Zac R. Daley


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   Delete. Tikiwont (talk) 09:19, 10 June 2008 (UTC)

Zac R. Daley

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Unverifiable, suspected hoax. A quick search for the subject (excluding Bebo) gets all of 19 unique ghits, none related. MER-C 08:57, 2 June 2008 (UTC)


 * Delete Probable hoax; even if not, NN and not verifiable. — 97198   talk  11:39, 2 June 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete. Possible WP:HOAX; will so tag. Qworty (talk) 12:04, 2 June 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete - "Lord of Cork" is not a peerage title, it is a landed title. If this person had a peerage title, such as "Alfred Lord Tennyson" (also styled as "Lord Tennyson"), we would likely find that there was some notability attached. A lord of the manor ("Lord of Wherever"), simply identifies (archaicly) ownership of a plot of land registered with that name. Cork is high profile, so I don't doubt you can buy (theoretical) ownership of a tiny piece of some internet huxter's land there. Technically, that would make you Your Name Here, Lord of Cork. "Last Lord of Cork" is odd, though. (Oh, and none of the usual peerage sources found anything.) - Mdsummermsw (talk) 18:58, 3 June 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom, fails the everything test. RFerreira (talk) 17:27, 9 June 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.