Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Zacarias Porfirio Paris


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. postdlf (talk) 22:37, 27 December 2012 (UTC)

Zacarias Porfirio Paris

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Fails WP:BASEBALL/N. Former minor league baseball player Penale52 (talk) 22:01, 20 December 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Baseball-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 22:55, 21 December 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 22:55, 21 December 2012 (UTC)


 * Delete Seems like a pretty clear-cut case of not meeting the notability guidelines.  Automatic Strikeout  ( T •  C) 23:04, 21 December 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete Awesome name, but I can't for the life of me figure out why somebody created an article on this guy, even if it was only two sentences. Fails WP:GNG with no coverage that I can see. – Muboshgu (talk) 23:05, 21 December 2012 (UTC)
 * Upon further review, the user who created this page has not edited any other page on Wikipedia. That's usually a sign that the page was created because of some personal connection the individual has with the subject, including the possibility of autobiography. Just a hunch. – Muboshgu (talk) 23:07, 21 December 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete - Cool name does not provide notability, nor does anything else I can find for him, and even the name is listed merely as "Zac Paris" at B-R. Rlendog (talk) 02:10, 22 December 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete. This is an easy one: non-notable minor league baseball player.  Never played a Major League Baseball game, therefore not entitled to a presumption of notability per WP:NBASEBALL.  Substantive coverage of subject's minor league career is practically non-existent, and certainly insufficient to satisfy the general notability guidelines per WP:GNG.  Dirtlawyer1 (talk) 23:35, 26 December 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.