Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Zach Nastasiuk


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 13:45, 25 March 2016 (UTC)

Zach Nastasiuk

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

fails WP:NHOCKEY Joeykai (talk) 08:47, 2 March 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions.  /wiae   /tlk  14:34, 2 March 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Ice hockey-related deletion discussions.  /wiae   /tlk  14:34, 2 March 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Canada-related deletion discussions.  /wiae   /tlk  14:34, 2 March 2016 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Malcolmxl5 (talk) 01:35, 11 March 2016 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Delete: No evidence this player meets the GNG; sources are a mix of blogposts, team websites and routine sports coverage explicitly debarred by WP:ROUTINE.  Another of the hundreds of NN hockey bio articles thrown up by the creator in defiance of the NHOCKEY criteria, and for which he's been under sanction regarding new article creation for many months, all in search of some mythical article creation Game High Score.   Ravenswing   17:42, 14 March 2016 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Kharkiv07  ( T ) 18:07, 18 March 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete Only 40 combined regular season and playoff games in the AHL to this point and no coverage exists about him that isn't routine in nature. Deadman137 (talk) 20:21, 21 March 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete as he's questionable for the applicable independent notability. SwisterTwister   talk  04:58, 24 March 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.