Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Zachary Bernard


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy delete‎__EXPECTED_UNCONNECTED_PAGE__. G11 — Ingenuity (talk • contribs) 13:44, 6 September 2023 (UTC)

Zachary Bernard

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

No indication of notability, article also promotional, don't know if quite qualifies for CSD G11.

|this is the only WP:RS I found, other than that, |this is more about the company than the subject himself. NotAGenious (talk) 13:29, 6 September 2023 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Businesspeople and Canada. NotAGenious (talk) 13:29, 6 September 2023 (UTC)
 * appears to be Speedy Deletion ready, the template is there. Oaktree b (talk) 13:32, 6 September 2023 (UTC)


 * @User:Gronk Oz kindly added a G11 tag at the same time, didn't know that Twinkle would still send the nomination. Anyways. NotAGenious (talk) 13:30, 6 September 2023 (UTC)


 * Speedy delete per Gronk Oz. Needs a complete rewrite. Wikishovel (talk) 13:43, 6 September 2023 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

* Delete - I also nominated it for CSD, at precisely the same time as this AfD was raised. The article only contains blatant promotion, such as "he has expressed invaluable online marketing expertise, enabling his clientele to forge a digital presence" and "he played a pivotal role in assisting multi-million dollar companies to optimize their processes for efficiency". These would be bad enough in his CV, but they certainly should not be said in Wikipedia's voice.--Gronk Oz (talk) 13:47, 6 September 2023 (UTC)