Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Zack Zeigler


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was delete. —Centrx→talk &bull; 09:30, 26 November 2006 (UTC)

Zack Zeigler


Lacks notability, Simply list of 'Zach Facts' --  dhp 1080  (u&middot;t&middot;c)  23:13, 20 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete unless it gets referenced. Mangecourt 23:17, 20 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Zack Facts have been removed; now completely factual. miketinte 23:00, 20 November 2006 (EST)
 * Still fails WP:NOTE with around 600 google hits. --  dhp 1080  (u&middot;t&middot;c)  00:49, 22 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Google hits are not relevant. Article is not less notable if hits are less then some number. There are articles with a few hits only, but very notable. Tulkolahten 12:00, 24 November 2006 (UTC)
 * That's very true, but I think I was using it as more of an illustration. Not a very good one at that. --  dhp 1080  (u&middot;t&middot;c)  22:58, 24 November 2006 (UTC)


 * Delete. Not notable. Tulkolahten 13:11, 23 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Fails WP:BIO and WP:NOTE. Tulkolahten 10:37, 24 November 2006 (UTC)

Keep it. He writes for wwe.com. Check the site, how is that not valid? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 66.26.82.167 (talk • contribs)
 * Simple. He's just not notable. He might write for the site, but this article would doubtfully be of much worth to other areas of the encyclopedia. --  dhp 1080  (u&middot;t&middot;c)  22:57, 24 November 2006 (UTC)

keep it. i found this very helpful — Preceding unsigned comment added by 63.208.148.254 (talk • contribs)
 * I really believe 63.208.148.254 and 66.26.82.167 are sockpuppets voters. Tulkolahten 22:37, 25 November 2006 (UTC)


 * Delete. Fails WP:Bio. -THB 20:12, 25 November 2006 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.