Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Zadock Woods


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was merge to Old Three Hundred. (non-admin closure) ansh 666 19:11, 8 July 2016 (UTC)

Zadock Woods

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

NOT MEMORIAL. Handbook of Texas is a comprehensive not a selective source  DGG ( talk ) 04:58, 23 June 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. --Cameron11598 (Talk) 05:10, 23 June 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Texas-related deletion discussions. --Cameron11598 (Talk) 05:10, 23 June 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. North America1000 21:15, 29 June 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of History-related deletion discussions. North America1000 21:15, 29 June 2016 (UTC)

 References
 * Keep – The subject meets WP:BASIC per a review of available sources. Some source examples are listed below. Since this is an article about a historical subject from the 1800s, perhaps more offline book sources are available. This also has potential to be merged to Old Three Hundred. North America1000 21:19, 29 June 2016 (UTC)
 * Texas Cemeteries. University of Texas Press.
 * Sons of the Republic of Texas. Turner Publishing Company. pp. 178–179
 * Daughters of Republic of Texas. Turner Publishing Company.
 * Forgotten Texas Leader. Texas A&M University Press.
 * Merge to Old Three Hundred . I'm not impressed with the sources from Northamerica1000. The sources don't discuss the subject in any real detail and the subject fails WP:MILPEOPLE, too. WP:BASIC says "trivial coverage of a subject by secondary sources may not be sufficient to establish notability" which I think is the case here. Chris Troutman  ( talk ) 23:53, 29 June 2016 (UTC)
 * Comment – I'm fine with a merge too. Note that other books are likely available that cover the subject though; every reliable published book in the world has not been digitized and uploaded to the internet. North America1000 02:15, 30 June 2016 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Sam Sailor Talk! 18:13, 30 June 2016 (UTC)
 * Merge -- No individual notability. Peterkingiron (talk) 17:02, 3 July 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.