Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Zafira (person)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Cirt (talk) 00:35, 25 November 2009 (UTC)

Zafira (person)

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

The person does not fulfill WP:PORNBIO. I had noticed it in July, asked author for his opinion and proposed the page for deletion (actually, the intention was to change it to redirect). The article was changed to redirect. This has been recently reverted, but unfortunately without adding any new sources or reasons, so I believe the original argument of non-notability still applies. Tchoř (talk) 00:43, 18 November 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been added to the WikiProject Pornography list of deletions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:56, 18 November 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete, unacceptable sourcing. Do not redirect to the unrelated Opel Zafira. Andrea105 (talk) 01:05, 18 November 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete - (1) Insufficient significant coverage in reliable independent sources to satisfy WP:N. (2) No claim of notability (particularly against criterion at WP:PORNBIO) capable of demonstrating her as other than run of the mill. - DustFormsWords (talk) 01:54, 18 November 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.