Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Zagnut


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep.  MBisanz  talk 22:59, 31 January 2020 (UTC)

Zagnut

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Yes, it exists. Yes, I've heard of it. However, I am unable to find any independent reliable sources that have enough to say about it to support a reasonably detailed article. Sum mer PhD v2.0 14:40, 9 January 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Food and drink-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 14:41, 9 January 2020 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Weak Keep/Redirect to List of products manufactured by The Hershey Company where it is already included and briefly described. There are plenty of results that come up with searching, but as mentioned by the nom, they are all pretty passing and mostly just describe what the bar is made out of.  It seems to be a product that is mentioned a lot in sources, but without anything actually in-depth said about it that would allow for much of an article.  About the only coverage I'm finding that really goes beyond mere mentions are a couple of articles reporting on an anecdote that John Smoltz recounted last year about his belief that Zagnut bars are unlucky.  I'm fairly undecided about whether I think the article could be built up or not, but, as there is a good target for a Redirect if nothing else, deletion is not appropriate here.  Rorshacma (talk) 17:52, 9 January 2020 (UTC)
 * Keep. A brief online search turned up a large multitude of sources on this subject, and searches on Google Books and sources like Newsbank/Lexis indicate there are many offline sources about this topic as well. Since this type of candy bar predates the Internet but multiple decades, it makes some sense that there isn't a lot of new coverage easily Google-able sources, but that shouldn't be taken as an indication it hasn't received coverage in sources. The sources are out there for anyone inclined to do some digging, and while the article as it stands right now it needs work, that in itself doesn't mean it's not notable or should be deleted. — Hunter Kahn 14:30, 10 January 2020 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Nosebagbear (talk) 00:18, 17 January 2020 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Keep Passes WP:GNG.-Splinemath (talk) 02:59, 17 January 2020 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  Sandstein   12:50, 24 January 2020 (UTC)
 * Keep Historical candy bar. Mentioned in Sweet Tooth: The Bittersweet History of Candy, page 244 and passing mention as part of Hershey's brands in Candy Bites: The Science of Sweets, Page 13. Numerous mentions in gBooks, mostly in passing, but giving the historical context for the once more ubiquitous candy bar. Passes WP:GNG and note that notability is not temporary. Geoff &#124; Who, me? 18:27, 28 January 2020 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.