Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Zahed Mannan


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. j⚛e deckertalk 22:44, 18 November 2014 (UTC)

Zahed Mannan

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Article about a Bangladeshi academic that fails both GNG and WP:PROF. All online coverage I can find is self-generated, and the subject's works have no holdings and no citations that I could find. § FreeRangeFrog croak 18:24, 30 October 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bangladesh-related deletion discussions.  Jinkinson   talk to me  22:58, 30 October 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions.  Jinkinson   talk to me  22:58, 30 October 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Management-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:18, 31 October 2014 (UTC)


 * Delete. I can find no evidence the subject satisfies the relevant notability guidelines. -- Rrburke (talk) 21:38, 1 November 2014 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Randykitty (talk) 16:21, 6 November 2014 (UTC)


 * Delete: Per nom, does not seem notable enough for inclusion, many of the citations are non RS and one just points to the webpage of the company where the article claims he worked (looks like an advertisement) .--Crystallizedcarbon (talk) 22:14, 6 November 2014 (UTC)
 * Should include: I am from Bangladesh and personally verified the sources used in this article. All citation is correct and some reference/citation looks like non RS because these sources have no proper link. I don't know why Crystallizedcarbon is thinking that linking with a website where this person worked before is like an advertisement. Is it mean we shouldn't link any company website where we work?
 * Delete - assistant and other non-tenured professors are very common and are rarely notable. Bearian (talk) 21:33, 18 November 2014 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.