Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Zakhmi Aurat


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. John254 20:32, 20 April 2008 (UTC)

Zakhmi Aurat

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Unsourced, almost no content, no indication of notability. '' May you go in God's care. '' Peter Deer (talk) 21:36, 16 April 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep Google search reveals many results about the film, sources need to be added.  Atyndall93  |  talk   02:15, 17 April 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep. In less time than it took to add all those tags to the article (most of which were redundant to each other) and start this AfD the nominator could have done a Google News search and added a reference into the article to the first of the hits. Phil Bridger (talk) 15:40, 17 April 2008 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions.   -- Fabrictramp (talk) 16:02, 17 April 2008 (UTC)
 * Weak Keep - I don't blame the nominator for nominating this. It is the creating editor's job to establish verifiable notability.  While we've verified the film exists, I am not so sure of its notability.  But I am in a generous mood. - House of Scandal (talk) 20:57, 18 April 2008 (UTC)
 * Comment. Just in case anyone doesn't find the Google News links enough for notability, please check out Google Books and Google Scholar. Peer-reviewed scholarly articles are the gold standard in reliable sources which are the basis of notability. Phil Bridger (talk) 08:30, 19 April 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.