Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Zaman Ali (philosopher)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. RL0919 (talk) 18:01, 28 September 2019 (UTC)

Zaman Ali (philosopher)

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

The subject fails WP:NPOL and WP:NAUTHOR. Ali was a candidate for the National Assembly of Pakistan but was not elected. The article claims Ali received attention "as one of youngest candidate to secure votes", but the cited sources are just routine coverage that contain passing mentions of Ali. Ali is also the author of two books, but I can't find WorldCat entries for either, much less anything that would satisfy NAUTHOR. – Lord Bolingbroke (talk) 17:43, 21 September 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Philosophy-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 18:30, 21 September 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Pakistan-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 18:30, 21 September 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 18:31, 21 September 2019 (UTC)

If these article is for delete then what about all of these articles. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Abdul_Khaliq_(philosopher) https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/C._A._Qadir https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kalim_Siddiqui https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Zaheen_Shah_Taji https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Intisar-ul-Haque https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Saifuddin_Bohra

They don't have even one single good reference and don't have any identifiers from prominent identifiers. so you https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Lord_Bolingbroke what you say about all of this because u know nothing.

and Zaman ali world cat entry will be here in few days then what? then you have to accept this article. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Danyl8901 (talk • contribs) 08:29, 22 September 2019 (UTC) 
 * Delete: See Zaman Ali, Sockpuppet investigations/Zaman Ali 01 and c:User:Achim55/Sockpuppet investigations/Zaman Ali. --Achim (talk) 11:48, 22 September 2019 (UTC)
 * Delete fails WP:NPOL as he did not win any election, he lost one though. dont see any reason for him passing WP:NAUTHOR either.  Danyl8901 please see WP:OSE you can go ahead and delete them if you find them not passing WP:N criteria. regards. -- D Big X ray ᗙ  12:31, 22 September 2019 (UTC)
 * Delete. People do not get Wikipedia articles just for being candidates in elections they did not win, so he doesn't pass WP:NPOL as a politician — but if you have to source the existence of his books to GoodReads and BookFinder entries, because reliable source coverage about them is nonexistent, then he doesn't pass WP:AUTHOR as a philosopher either. And Dany18901 needs to read WP:WAX if they think their ability to find other articles that aren't better sourced than this means this has to be kept: more likely those other articles need to be deleted too, and just hadn't been noticed by a responsible editor until Dany pointed them out. Bearcat (talk) 16:17, 22 September 2019 (UTC)
 * KeepSo where is your criteria that many articles are on Wikipedia from years and not deleted despite having bad sources. that mean wikipedia is total fraud, and any admin can delete any article whenever he want and no check and balance on all those articles that are here. and i could show you thousands of worse articles and they all are on wikipedia. so how can we say you guys are doing better work here. that's why wikipedia is losing it's credibility. if you want to delete this then delete all those articles. and i know many paid admin who works for others and make fake articles and because they are admins and know how fake bad sources into good one and then articles don't get deleted. what about them? answer me with valid argument then delete this article. and if you don't have any valid argument then you are wasting your time here. because fake but expert people are making articles here with not any good sources. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Danyl8901 (talk • contribs) 16:36, 22 September 2019 (UTC)
 * Danyl8901, you did create your account on 25 June. Just that day Zaman Ali's d:Q42709759 has been deleted. And - surprise! - just that day you created a new one d:Q64826519. So you shouldn't be surprised, if someone starts an SPI against you. --Achim (talk) 22:31, 22 September 2019 (UTC)
 * Achim watch out man you have some wrong agenda here, you are fake and not the right person here, wikipedia is about putting articles with references but you fake shit you are here to make and delete articles on your personal likes and dislikes, wikipedia should ban you from here. and yes i created articles but with citations and sources and not without that if you have problem with sources and citation then talk otherwise do some right work in life and not waste others time. you are not the only one to delete this, let votes here and if people think article doesn't have right citations or not good enough then delete it on that basis. but your opinion here is fake one and doesn't matter because you are here with wrong intention. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Danyl8901 (talk • contribs) 06:42, 23 September 2019 (UTC)
 * Delete per WP:TOOSOON and WP:MILL - this is a twenty-something writer without major publications. Bearian (talk) 14:35, 23 September 2019 (UTC)
 * Delete fails WP:NPOL and WP:NAUTHOR, subject wasn't notable the first time the article was deleted and isn't notable now. Best, GPL93 (talk) 22:18, 23 September 2019 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom but also per G4 and G5. This is obvious sock puppetry and vanity spamming. Praxidicae (talk) 16:19, 25 September 2019 (UTC)


 * Danyl8901 okay delete it, looks alike you are in consensus for deleting it. —Preceding undated comment added 16:24, 26 September 2019 (UTC)
 * Delete - fails WP:NPOL and WP:NAUTHOR and isn't notable now. - MA Javadi (talk) 16:56, 26 September 2019 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.