Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Zambian Breweries


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep.  So Why  08:17, 15 July 2017 (UTC)

Zambian Breweries

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

no 3rd party evidence of notability. Unwisely accepted draft  DGG ( talk ) 07:47, 7 July 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. North America1000 08:41, 7 July 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Food and drink-related deletion discussions. North America1000 08:41, 7 July 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Africa-related deletion discussions. North America1000 08:41, 7 July 2017 (UTC)


 * Comment – GBooks and GNews links above are providing some sources, such as, , , , , , . More are readily available. North America1000 08:46, 7 July 2017 (UTC)
 * Keep significantly sized (market cap USD$376 million) public company manufacturing widely distributed consumer products. Most public companies are assumed notable partly because the regulatory filings and financial media create enough reliable sources and significant coverages. In this case the compamy is one of 22 listed on Zambia's leading stock exchange and there is the sourced statement "The company has a virtual monopoly on clear brew products in Zambia"  plus they are the Coca-Cola bottler in Zambia which is likely pretty big business. It would be hard to spend much time in Zambia without enriching Zambrew with that kind of market power. Legacypac (talk) 11:10, 7 July 2017 (UTC)
 * Comment - I have focussed on content addition and admit  I understand little of administrative functions of Wikipedia. How does a publicly listed company raise a red flag on the system as a non-notable company? It most certainly has larger production volumes than Bass Brewery and Dogfish Head Brewery and has 2% growth in beer volumes. &amp;Brewt@lk 08:59, 10 July 2017 (UTC)
 * Keep - unless you can say why it is NOT notable! &amp;Brewt@lk 09:46, 10 July 2017 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.