Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Zameen Ke Tare


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) &mdash; Music1201  talk  02:10, 7 May 2016 (UTC)

Zameen Ke Tare

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Non-notable film WP:NFILM JMHamo (talk) 21:40, 22 April 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete at best as I have found a few links so far at Books but, unless better archived coverage can be found, there's nothing currently suggesting keeping. SwisterTwister   talk  22:57, 22 April 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions.  SwisterTwister   talk  22:57, 22 April 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions.  SwisterTwister   talk  22:57, 22 April 2016 (UTC)


 * needs more digging:
 * director:
 * star:
 * star:
 * star:
 * tear:
 * WP:INDAFD: Zameen Ke Tare Chandulal Shah Master Bhagwan Daisy Irani Honey Irani Krishna Kumari

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Keep as an expandable stub. 30 years-before-the-internet online archives of Indian News sources for a 56 rear-old-film do not exist, so the only reasonable place sources will be found will be obituaries of the principles and in the available book sources which establish it as having become part of Indian cinematic history. At he very least, under WP:NF by it "representing a unique accomplishment in cinema, is a milestone in the development of film art, or contributes significantly to the development of a national cinema" or by its "featuring significant involvement (i.e., one of the most important roles in the making of the film) by a notable person and is a major part of his/her career", it can be mentioned and sourced within the articles elsewhere. A separate article is fine if "...it would clutter up the biography page of that person if it was mentioned there." A flat out deletion does not serve our readers.   Schmidt,  Michael Q. 11:01, 23 April 2016 (UTC)
 * Keep like I was saying when I removed the PROD tag, the film seems to be available on DVD today, which is a clear sign of significance for a 56-year-old film. Thanks and regards, Biwom (talk) 07:40, 24 April 2016 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, &mdash; Spaceman  Spiff  11:59, 29 April 2016 (UTC)
 * Keep - the film was unsuccessful at the box office, though that in itself may be notable as part of the "downfall" of a famous director. Considering the notability of the film studio, director, actors, and music director, I think it's suitable for inclusion in an encyclopedia. It has at least been mentioned in the Encyclopaedia of Hindi Cinema and Encyclopaedia of Indian Cinema, and is likely to have been reviewed in the press at the time, even if we can't find it with google. Let's give the opportunity for Bollywood film historians to improve it in the future. There's no rush... -- IamNotU (talk) 20:23, 29 April 2016 (UTC)
 * KeepAs per above Deathlibrarian (talk) 07:05, 30 April 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.