Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Zamiruddin Sardar


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. The Bushranger One ping only 05:18, 19 November 2017 (UTC)

Zamiruddin Sardar

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Incomprehensible. No references. Google search turns up only the Wikipedia history of this article, and no one with this name or dates, which makes it unlikely that someone else can repair this. PROD was applied but removed. Robert McClenon (talk) 21:24, 12 November 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 22:21, 12 November 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of History-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 22:21, 12 November 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 22:21, 12 November 2017 (UTC)


 * Delete I fixed the atrocious grammar, but it is still unreferenced and almost certainly non-notable. (The same editor has contributed significantly to Chhatwan, parts of which are likewise a trainwreck.) Agricolae (talk) 01:01, 13 November 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete. Unsourced. Wasn't able to find sources in a BEFORE. Seems being the best known person in the village of Chhatwan does not confer coverage sufficient for notability.Icewhiz (talk) 08:23, 13 November 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete unless sourced and expanded to show that he was notable. Peterkingiron (talk) 16:43, 13 November 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete - Someone like this could be suitable for an article, but requires reliable sources first. Smmurphy(Talk) 18:35, 13 November 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete - Insufficient sources available to demonstrate notability. --Jack Frost (talk) 09:56, 14 November 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete I can't find any sources, though online sources about this may be hard to find but the absence of even unreliable sources mentioning is very suspicious if this man even ever existed. &thinsp;&mdash; Ammarpad (talk) 17:43, 18 November 2017 (UTC)
 * I don't doubt he existed but he appears to have been your typical 'big fish in a (very) small pond', and non-notable no matter how well remembered by the natives of that puddle (which the creating editor seems to be). Agricolae (talk) 19:32, 18 November 2017 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.