Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Zander Kaufman

 This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or on a Votes for Undeletion nomination). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was DELETE. -Splash 22:29, 10 September 2005 (UTC)

Zander Kauffman
''Listing nomination from August 3. no vote. Notice that the user that tagged the article made no comment here.'' Nabla 00:48:29, 2005-09-02 (UTC)


 * Zander Kauffman is a great writer who has written brillint works in Black point review and his book comes out in late 05 to correct the other article writer..... Don't cast this man away just because he happens to be in the left wing. (by 68.96.140.50 2005-08-11 03:45:24)
 * Delete, seems to be vanity (First novel is unpublished; others not mentioned), although I had a good laugh at the picture.--Firsfron 23:58, 24 August 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete. 134 hits on Google, all from online book reviews or online forum comments. I don't think this meets notability criteria for a bio. (I have 16,300, but do not claim notability based on online writing.) He appears to be be known in a small community of online writers, but not more widely. If his book is a best-seller, I'm sure someone will step up and write a new article. MCB 02:12, 2 September 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete, non-notable. Sorry.  Nandesuka 02:34, 2 September 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete any article whose author doesn't even know what the title of his first yet-to-be-published work is. Zoe 05:17, September 2, 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete ...unless if the author of the article can include within it of any clickable links to reliable sources that can make a suitable arguement of why this certain individual should deserve an article within Wikipedia! UniReb 11:12, 2 September 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete per MCB & Zoe. Side note, Kauffman's real name may be "Philip Walter," didn't find anything under that name either.Crypticfirefly
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in an undeletion request). No further edits should be made to this page.