Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Zapak


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was delete. No policy-based argument for keeping has been submitted. I would have speedied this as blatant spam (WP:CSD). Sandstein 06:00, 7 December 2006 (UTC)

Zapak


This was originally prodded by User:SkierRMH with the comment "Spam, even with extensive re-writes this article is simply a long ad for a bunch of softwear". The prod was removed without comment by User:220.227.55.18 (talk), an apparent single purpose account. In 220.227.55.18's defense, he left a comment on SkierRMH's talk page (since blanked) asking how/if the article could be saved. SkierRMH re-added the prod tag, which is not the right thing to do, so I've taken the article to AfD instead. It does smell somewhat spammy, and I think it's a not-yet-launched portal, which would fall short of our notability guidelines, but I'm not entirely sure, and I'm a little concerned about the prodder's peremptory behavior (and his spelling), so I'm not sure of my own position on this yet. Therefore, this nomination should be considered procedural (although I reserve the right to choose a side later after further study). Xtifr tälk 21:52, 30 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete as blatant advertising. Demiurge 21:59, 30 November 2006 (UTC)
 * delete because it is spam BioGeek 23:33, 2 December 2006 (UTC)
 * oppose deletion the company has a online game portal in india with a very large number of games Ashishtroop 21:28, 6 December 2006 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.