Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Zara Holland


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Consensus was that sourcing was enough to pass notability criteria. (non-admin closure)  Onel 5969  TT me 15:20, 10 December 2018 (UTC)

Zara Holland

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Lacking comprehensive coverage other than her Miss Great Britain and Love Island, also it lacks major sources despite gains media attention of the latter. Sheldybett (talk) 12:51, 3 December 2018 (UTC)
 * So your argument is basically WP:BLP2E? Regards So  Why  14:04, 3 December 2018 (UTC)
 * Keep -- I do not understand this nomination. The sources already in the article, which include coverage from the BBC and the Independent as well as other RS, already meet the GNG. There are plenty of others. 192.160.216.52 (talk) 14:18, 3 December 2018 (UTC)
 * Keep - sources indicating notability are plentiful. FOARP (talk) 15:54, 3 December 2018 (UTC)
 * Keep - surely a Miss GB title would pass WP:BLPN? Andy Dingley (talk) 00:31, 4 December 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 00:20, 4 December 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 00:20, 4 December 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 00:21, 4 December 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Beauty pageants-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 00:21, 4 December 2018 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.