Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Zarafa Outlook Sharing


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was delete. - Mailer Diablo 17:52, 10 October 2006 (UTC)

Zarafa Outlook Sharing
This non-notable application fails the proposed WP:SOFTWARE and current WP:CORP. The 50 unique search engine results yield no obvious sources to improve this article to encyclopedic levels of notability. Erechtheus 04:55, 27 September 2006 (UTC)


 * On many websites only the name Zarafa is used. Because the name Zarafa was already in use on Wikipedia, I used the name Zarafa Outlook Sharing. When you search only on Zarafa you find much more links, such a Redhat Partnership, Freshmeat and a lot of Zarafa resellers.milo-oostergo 09:22, 27 September 2006
 * Comment The issue is whether you find the sorts of reliable sources that may establish notability. I saw nothing obvious when conducting a search of Zarafa and the word "software". If you are aware of appropriate coverage, I'd suggest noting it either here or citing it in the article itself. Erechtheus 18:27, 27 September 2006 (UTC)
 * Comment Ok, please do a search for zarafa and linux, and you find much more links. See also the site of the developers from Exchange4Linux. milo-oostergo 21:46, 27 September 2006
 * Delete. Insufficiently notable, and no credible, third-party sources as required by WP:V. -- Satori Son 05:20, 1 October 2006 (UTC)


 *  AFD relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached.  Please add new discussions below this notice. Thanks, Mailer Diablo 14:25, 3 October 2006 (UTC)


 * Delete - fails WP:WEB, nothing to say why this is notable. Thryduulf 23:12, 9 October 2006 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.