Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Zarah Shah


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Courcelles (talk) 18:10, 10 September 2015 (UTC)

Zarah Shah

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Person not notable. References cited are inapt. This ref is a quoted twice; is from a cricketing website and not totally reliable. This source just shows a tweet with his twitter handle. this, this, this, this, this and this sources do not even mention his name. It is his father who is mentioned in all the references. IMDb is also cited, which is not a reliable source.  Arun Kumar SINGH (Talk)  14:35, 3 September 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. --  1Wiki8 Q5G7FviTHBac3dx8HhdNYwDVstR  (talk) 19:23, 3 September 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. --  1Wiki8 Q5G7FviTHBac3dx8HhdNYwDVstR  (talk) 19:23, 3 September 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 04:04, 5 September 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of United Arab Emirates-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 04:04, 5 September 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Ireland-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 04:04, 5 September 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Cricket-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 04:04, 5 September 2015 (UTC)


 * Delete. Has done precisely nothing notable.  IgnorantArmies  (talk)  15:03, 5 September 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete. Per nom. Doesn't appear to meet WP:NACTOR or WP:NSPORTS or (per the issues highlighted by the nominator with the provided references) doesn't seem to meet WP:SIGCOV under the GNG guideline. Guliolopez (talk) 23:54, 6 September 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete for now as my searches found nothing good to suggest meaningful better improvement. SwisterTwister   talk  06:39, 10 September 2015 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.