Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Zarb-e-Sukhan (Kulliyaat)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Taking into account the votestacking/canvassing. &spades;PMC&spades; (talk) 04:06, 12 May 2020 (UTC)

Zarb-e-Sukhan (Kulliyaat)

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

This article was previously created as Zarb-e-Sukhan. A AfD concluded (Articles for deletion/Zarb-e-Sukhan) the book fails WP:GNG and WP:NBOOK.

It was created early this year by a newbie - very likely a sock of User:Justice007. Saqib (talk) 09:15, 3 May 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Poetry-related deletion discussions. North America1000 09:22, 3 May 2020 (UTC)


 * Keep: This nomination for deletion is based on unfair and bad faith since a bunch of users misusing the policies to personal motives. The article clearly passes the Notability (books) and even GNG. The article after a review by the user:AaqibAnjum was on the main page. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2001:1C00:1604:BB00:459B:2CED:129E:AAB0 (talk) 16:32, 3 May 2020 (UTC)
 * For the record, this IP is a serial sockpuppeteer. See Sockpuppet investigations/Justice007. --Saqib (talk) 10:21, 5 May 2020 (UTC)


 * Delete: I think it's clear that this does not meet the guidelines for notability, and has been created for the purpose of self-promotion. The author's page should be more than sufficient for encyclopaedic purposes. Akakievich (talk) 03:29, 4 May 2020 (UTC)


 * Akakievich, I cannot figure out that you registered on 13 April 2020 and you become an expert on the rules and you were the first to object on the subject's article as well. It seems something awkward here, which visibly creates ambiguity and distrust but you should understand the rule that clearly says as - The book has been the subject of two or more non-trivial published works appearing in sources that are independent of the book itself. This can include published works in all forms, such as newspaper articles, other books, television documentaries, bestseller lists, and reviews. per Notability (books), the article has more than two most reliable sources, therefore, your delete request should be considered just a vote as collaboration as a part of Saqib whatever connections are there? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2001:1C00:1604:BB00:459B:2CED:129E:AAB0 (talk) 06:31, 4 May 2020 (UTC)


 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Poetry-related deletion discussions. Robert McClenon (talk) 03:20, 4 May 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Iran-related deletion discussions. Robert McClenon (talk) 03:20, 4 May 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Pakistan-related deletion discussions. Robert McClenon (talk) 03:21, 4 May 2020 (UTC)


 * delete as per nom. Nothing new, they just copied from previous article. Störm   (talk)  10:00, 4 May 2020 (UTC)
 * This user is clearly associated with the nominator for deletion as edit history shows since 2017, he disappears, but comes back together. This article was on the main page after the reviewer passed it and it was written by the mediateam as this discussion — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2001:1c00:1604:bb00:459b:2ced:129e:aab0 (talk • contribs)


 * Keep. Zarbe Sukhan is written by famous Pakistani poet and Pakistani newspaper is given in this article. Zakaria1978 (talk) 23:18, 4 May 2020 (UTC)
 * There's a page called Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions. You need to read that. Also its interesting you never participated in AfD before which could means WP:VOTESTACKING is going on. --Saqib (talk) 10:18, 5 May 2020 (UTC)
 * Busted. VOTESTACKING has been confirmed. --Saqib (talk) 11:05, 5 May 2020 (UTC)


 * You fall under Harassment, specially per Hounding, as hounding usually involves following the target from place to place on Wikipedia. VOTESTACKING has been confirmed, when you even do not bother to discuss the issues, and stay on your hegemony and illegimate editings, left no option to seek other neutral contributers of their input per as I asked them, it does not fall under convincing, see the wording - Please comment and vote with fairness and in a neutral way on - since I didn't ask individuals for Keep or Delete, I request on project. I am going to prove your bad-faith, precisely with your motives. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2001:1C00:1604:BB00:459B:2CED:129E:AAB0 (talk) 13:02, 5 May 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. comrade waddie96 (talk) 13:21, 8 May 2020 (UTC)


 * Strongly Keep: The book qualifies the GNG and notability book. As above keep comments. I do not see why the book should be deleted when it has reliable sources and significantly covered in the mainstream newspapers. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 5.117.117.149 (talk) 11:00, 9 May 2020 (UTC)
 * This AfD is sock infected. --Saqib (talk) 12:05, 9 May 2020 (UTC)


 * Delete and Merge parts of it with its parent article at Ehsan Sehgal. I had moved it to mainspace from draft based on the referenced provided. The AfD nominator has noticed that there is blatant suck puppetry connected with this submission and I assume this AfD has became a victim of convassing.  - Aaqib Anjum Aafī (talk) 17:32, 10 May 2020 (UTC)
 * Just noticed that one of its main contributors had attacked my created articles after I had rejected the draft of it at first. Likely, there is a COI issue as well with this submission, and Ehsan Sehgal both. See main contributor of this submission - Aaqib Anjum Aafī (talk) 17:50, 10 May 2020 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.