Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Zarifa Sautieva


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy keep. IAR. There is no way this article would or should be deleted, coupled with questions re: the nom. StarM 00:11, 14 October 2020 (UTC)

Zarifa Sautieva

 * – ( View AfD View log )

This article does not meet the relevance criteria for the English Wikipedia. Such articles were created en masse in many Wikipedia, this is PR. -- Кав0606 (talk) 16:20, 11 October 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: I finished the creation of this following a post on my talkpage by what I assume is the creator. ~ Amory  (u • t • c) 17:14, 11 October 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Politics-related deletion discussions. Lightburst (talk) 17:16, 11 October 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Lightburst (talk) 17:16, 11 October 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Museums and libraries-related deletion discussions. Lightburst (talk) 17:16, 11 October 2020 (UTC)


 * Comment - there do seem to be a lot of sources dedicated to her provided in the article. Is Caucasian Knot not a reliable source? Spiderone  17:19, 11 October 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Russia-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 19:18, 11 October 2020 (UTC)


 * — Кав0606 (talk&#32;• contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic. Vexations (talk) 19:52, 11 October 2020 (UTC)
 * In fact the creation of this AfD is their first and (so far) only edit using this editor name. Strange. Pam  D  11:13, 12 October 2020 (UTC)


 * Keep The BBC calls her "the most famous woman in Ingushetia". Vexations (talk) 20:00, 11 October 2020 (UTC)
 * Keep - covered in numerous reliable sources; the coverage is in-depth and there is nothing to suggest that the sources are not reliable       Spiderone  20:18, 11 October 2020 (UTC)
 * Keep: appears to be the subject of substantial coverage in reliable sources. Pam  D  11:13, 12 October 2020 (UTC)
 * Keep: Absolutely notable and the references/sources listed are reliable, reputable and verifiable, if you can translate Russian. That is outside what other international sources have stated about her including the BBC. I think additional international sources would be beneficial but are not necessary to prove her notability. Simply put, she passes WP:GNG. --Tsistunagiska (talk) 15:11, 12 October 2020 (UTC)
 * Keep: As background, I started the article as part of a WikiProject Women in Red/Meetup/162 which was themed on the Caucasus region. It was not created "en masse". She meets notability criteria. (Lajmmoore (talk) 08:45, 13 October 2020 (UTC))


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.