Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Zarzon


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. – Juliancolton  &#124; Talk 00:08, 4 June 2009 (UTC)

Zarzon

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Prod contested by IP. Article is unreferenced, and makes no claim/offers no evidence of notability. --EEMIV (talk) 00:18, 28 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Comment Aren't most video games by notable publishers usually considered notable? Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • (Many otters • One bat • One hammer) 01:32, 28 May 2009 (UTC)
 * See WP:PRODUCT. In this case, there is a small amount of verifiable information, but not enough for WP:N. In this case we could merge to List of SNK games and List of Taito games. Marasmusine (talk) 13:41, 31 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Game-related deletion discussions.  --  treelo  radda  16:35, 28 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Very weak keep: highly notable developer, publisher; encyclopedic value. The scarcity of sources is undeniable but typical for most arcade games of that era.
 * http://www.allgame.com/game.php?id=32540
 * http://www.klov.com/game_detail.php?letter=Z&game_id=10521 — Rankiri (talk) 17:37, 28 May 2009 (UTC)


 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of video game related deletion discussions. —Ost (talk) 14:26, 29 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Merge with the list articles as noted above. Tangentially notable, but not enough for its own article. Haipa Doragon (talk • contributions) 14:03, 31 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep per sources by Rankiri. This is trying to go into dangerous territory where we can be given the green light to delete articles of almost every game produced before 1990 due to lack of online sources and unknown print sources. Ten Pound Hammer was accurate in describing how we handle the notability of games on this site for at least several years, despite the policy that the admin waved in our faces. I don't like the precedent this is trying to set. Vodello (talk) 00:11, 2 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep per the Killer List of Videogames and Allgame reviews (now added to the article). There is probably more coverage in contemporary game press that is not online. --Apoc2400 (talk) 18:08, 2 June 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.