Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Zathyus Networks


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Secret account 16:16, 24 November 2013 (UTC)

Zathyus Networks

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Appears to fail our general notability guidelines. A previous article named ZetaBoards was deleted in the past and now redirects to this article. SarahStierch (talk) 19:57, 11 November 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Maryland-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 23:47, 11 November 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 23:47, 11 November 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 23:47, 11 November 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 23:47, 11 November 2013 (UTC)


 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Mark Arsten (talk) 01:06, 18 November 2013 (UTC)


 * Delete - fails WP:ORG: A company/organization "is notable if it has been the subject of significant coverage in secondary sources. Such sources must be reliable, and independent of the subject. A single independent source is almost never sufficient for demonstrating the notability of an organization." Only sources given are primary, and the first few pages of a Google search are no help. --Rhododendrites (talk) 04:02, 18 November 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete - ZetaBoards and InvisionFree are common forum hosts but obviously the parent company (Zathyus Networks) has not received as much attention. Multiple searches including Google News provided nothing (no news coverage or even in-depth for that matter) and there's not even much information about the company itself. Not much to even improve the article's current state. SwisterTwister   talk  00:07, 22 November 2013 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.