Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Zauber


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. MelanieN (talk) 00:39, 12 January 2016 (UTC)

Zauber

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Small software company with no notablility visible and no meaningful edits since the articles inception in 2009. S.K. (talk) 18:55, 4 January 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Argentina-related deletion discussions.  Human 3015   TALK    19:14, 4 January 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions.  Human 3015   TALK    19:14, 4 January 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions.  Human 3015   TALK    19:14, 4 January 2016 (UTC)


 * Delete per nom. Found no reliable coverage. -- Human 3015   TALK   19:15, 4 January 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete for now as the best I found were the expected links at Books and browsers. SwisterTwister   talk  05:08, 5 January 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete - Searches did not turn up enough in-depth coverage from independent reliable sources to show it passes either WP:GNG or WP:NCORP.  Onel 5969  TT me 10:59, 11 January 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.