Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Zavvi.com (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   merge to Zavvi (retailer). Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 12:51, 11 February 2014 (UTC)

Zavvi.com
AfDs for this article: 
 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Not notable. Philafrenzy (talk) 10:43, 4 February 2014 (UTC)
 * Speedy Keep - WP:BEFORE epic fail. Was kept in an AfD in 2009, and I can find all sorts on this company since then:, , , to name but a few. Their PS Vita cockup made an enormous media storm, but they have received coverage for numerous other things as well. Did you look for sources at all?  Luke no 94  (tell Luke off here) 13:29, 4 February 2014 (UTC)
 * Only the first two seem like reliable independent sources and all they actually say is that the company sent out the wrong product to some customers. Do you really think that amounts to notability? If so, anyone that is mentioned twice on the BBC could have an article. There is nothing distinctive or notable about this company. They just sell stuff on the internet and sometimes get it wrong. So what? Philafrenzy (talk) 14:00, 4 February 2014 (UTC)
 * Digital Spy is very clearly an RS, and if you actually did any legwork and looked at things, you'd know that. Internet Retailing may or may not be, but that's irrelevant. The company has received a lot of coverage in various reliable sources, and your comment amounts to WP:IDONTLIKEIT. There are also sources in the previous AfD that I didn't bother repeating. If you're still going to stick to your blatantly incorrect rationale, consider, , amongst various coverage on the PS Vita issue. You are blatantly misappropriating policy here, and the company clearly satisfies GNG. Do the sensible thing and withdraw this invalid AfD. Luke no 94  (tell Luke off here) 15:31, 4 February 2014 (UTC)
 * Please calm down and stop throwing policies around like bricks. We try to do things consensually here as you should know. The sources you have quoted do not seem very reliable to me and even if they are, they don't add up to very much. The company exists, it sells stuff, and it promotes it's products on computer gaming web sites etc. It doesn't add up to notability in my view, so I won't be withdrawing the nomination, sorry. Philafrenzy (talk) 22:40, 4 February 2014 (UTC)
 * I'm seriously doubting you've even attempted to look at the sources I've shown you here, much less followed WP:BEFORE and looked for sources yourself. Otherwise, you wouldn't be persisting with the clearly inaccurate claim that there is no notability to be found... Luke no 94  (tell Luke off here) 23:03, 4 February 2014 (UTC)


 * Merge to Zavvi (retailer) back at Zavvi. I certainly don't see deletion as appropriate here, but with such a short article with such a clear relation to the article on the shops chain, a merge seems appropriate. --Michig (talk) 07:21, 5 February 2014 (UTC)
 * I'm not against a merge, as outright deletion is most definitely inappropriate. Luke no 94  (tell Luke off here) 07:41, 5 February 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 20:01, 5 February 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 20:01, 5 February 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 20:02, 5 February 2014 (UTC)


 * Merge to Zavvi (retailer). Northamerica1000(talk) 03:06, 6 February 2014 (UTC)
 * Merge to Zavvi (retailer) - →Davey 2010→ →Talk to me!→  16:33, 7 February 2014 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.