Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Zbečník stream


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy keep (nomination withdrawn, no outstanding delete !votes; non admin closure). StAnselm (talk) 06:11, 20 August 2013 (UTC)

Zbečník stream

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

No sources, OR User:Surfer43 09:09, 18 August 2013 (UTC)


 * No delete - Что есть на стати столько плохого, чтобы ю было нужно удалить. Энциклопедичная значимость можно не большая но статья уже нет никакая заготовка, это полноценная статья. Правда, перевод сделал Google переводчик, но во всем остальном статья хорошая. Я сделал всё что было в моих силах но перевод пусть улучшить кто нибудь другой.--Toмa646 (talk) 17:55, 18 August 2013 (UTC)
 * Google translate (from Russian): "What on earth would have so much wrong with that u had to be removed. Encyclopedic significance can not large but the article is no longer any storage, it's a full article. However, the transfer did a Google translator, but otherwise good article. I did everything that was in my power to improve but the translation let somebody else." Ansh666 19:23, 18 August 2013 (UTC)
 * Статья удержалась на русской и чешской википедии. Этот достаточное доказательство энциклопедической значимости.--Toмa646 (talk) 21:04, 18 August 2013 (UTC)
 * Google translate: "Article hold onto the Russian and Czech Wikipedia. This is sufficient proof encyclopedic significance." Можете ли вы использовать английский язык? Не многие люди понимают русский здесь. Я использую Google Translate. Ansh666 21:09, 18 August 2013 (UTC)


 * Query - on what basis is this creek notable? Stalwart 111  10:53, 18 August 2013 (UTC)
 * Yeah, Vejvančický's answer is probably sufficient enough for me. Weak keep, then. Stalwart 111  07:04, 19 August 2013 (UTC)


 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Czech Republic-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000(talk) 13:17, 18 August 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Environment-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000(talk) 13:17, 18 August 2013 (UTC)


 * Delete - This has an unsourced article in Czech, but nothing to me indicates that this is nothing more than a run-of-the-mill stream... Michaelzeng7 (talk) 17:27, 18 August 2013 (UTC)
 * Striking !vote to reconsider per Ansh below. Michaelzeng7 (talk) 20:31, 18 August 2013 (UTC)


 * Comment Per WP:NGEO, "Named natural features  [which includes streams]  are often notable, provided information beyond statistics and coordinates is known to exist." I can't judge if it meets this (it claims to be a tributary of Metuje, but isn't listed on the sole source given there). Ansh666 19:23, 18 August 2013 (UTC)
 * Okay, per below, keep, I guess. Ansh666 06:24, 19 August 2013 (UTC)
 * Its here It claims to be a tributary of Metuje, but isn't listed on the sole source given there (The source of this information)--Toмa646 (talk) 09:17, 19 August 2013 (UTC)
 * Keep, valid and verifiable geographical information. The stream is also called Maternice or Maternička, see, , , . The village of Zbečník was founded over the valley of Zbečník stream in the 14th or 15th century . The information could be possibly merged and redirected to the main article about the village, but deletion would be a bad and counterproductive solution, unhepful to this encyclopedic project and its readers. --Vejvančický (talk / contribs) 05:56, 19 August 2013 (UTC)
 * Keep per above. Surfer43_¿qué_pasa? 13:23, 19 August 2013 (UTC)
 * You've withdrawn the nomination then? Stalwart 111  13:54, 19 August 2013 (UTC)
 * Yes. Surfer43_¿qué_pasa? 16:31, 19 August 2013 (UTC)


 * Keep per WP:NGEO and info by Vejvančický. --Oakshade (talk) 04:53, 20 August 2013 (UTC)
 * Move to close - nomination has been withdrawn and there are no outstanding delete !votes. Stalwart 111  05:15, 20 August 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.