Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ze-gen


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. Master of Puppets - Call me MoP! :D  05:47, 26 August 2009 (UTC)

Ze-gen

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Article fails WP:NOTABILITY, WP:CORP, WP:NOT, WP:SPAM and WP:COI. Article was created by an WP:SPA account with no other edits other than related to Ze-gen. Was speedied twice under WP:CSD and WP:CSD spam advertising. Self-promotion and product placement are WP:NOT the routes to having an encyclopaedia article. Hu12 (talk) 18:56, 19 August 2009 (UTC)


 * Keep Ze-gen is an innovative green technology company and this page is extremely informative. This page helped me grasp the concept of liquid metal gasification which I believe to be one of the many technologies required to re-energize our community and environment.  There are articles out there in this space enernoc that are much more geared towards advertising.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Water2polo (talk • contribs) 20:01, 19 August 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep - In-depth coverage by Forbes - Business Wire – earthtimes.org - International Business Times – CNET News – Boston Globe – Recycling Today – Patriot Ledger – Bloomberg plus numerous international sources, in my opinion, meets our notability criteria for inclusion here at Wikipedia.  Thanks ShoesssS Talk 20:42, 19 August 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep per Shoessss. There are plenty of in-depth reliable sources in Google News Archive. This company easily passes WP:CORP and WP:V. Cunard (talk) 22:33, 19 August 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep - The coverage at sources listed above indicates that Ze-gen passes WP:CORP. "An organization is generally considered notable if it has been the subject of significant coverage in reliable, independent secondary sources." Gary (talk) 22:35, 19 August 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Massachusetts-related deletion discussions. Thryduulf (talk) 19:38, 23 August 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. Thryduulf (talk) 19:38, 23 August 2009 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.