Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Zebedee (company)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Eddie891 Talk Work 20:33, 23 November 2021 (UTC)

Zebedee (company)

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Advertisement of a fintech startup unable to satisfy WP:NCORP, WP:GNG. DMySon (talk) 15:50, 16 November 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Video games-related deletion discussions. DMySon (talk) 15:50, 16 November 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Finance-related deletion discussions. DMySon (talk) 15:50, 16 November 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. DMySon (talk) 15:50, 16 November 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. DMySon (talk) 15:50, 16 November 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete - Coverage seems to be entirely in PR-like, non-RS sources with names that are all linked to Crypto. The two NASDAQ articles I found in my before seemed to be WP:MILL coverage seemingly based on press releases. WP:PROMO. FOARP (talk) 19:08, 16 November 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete - self-sourced promotional article about a cryptocurrency company. Not notable at all. Anton.bersh (talk) 11:56, 17 November 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete - If we ignore the crypto press per WP:NCRYPTO, including Nasdaq (which is a reprint of an article published in Bitcoin Magazine), all we're left with is two links to the same VentureBeat article (the independence of which is debatable). This falls well short of WP:NCORP. Pegnawl (talk) 15:45, 17 November 2021 (UTC)
 * Keep - Noting your concerns, the article has been edited to comply with notability (WP:NCORP, WP:GNG). Removed and added citations with sources to comply with WP:NCRYPTO. Also edited the article to focus on notability to keep in guideline with WP:MILL and not just be a WP:PROMO. I believe it is significant enought to warrant its own article. Darealkekec (talk) 15:15, 19 November 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete No evidence of notability, advertising content. Brayan ocaner (talk) 22:28, 19 November 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete: Apart from VentureBeat, the sources used appear unreliable, and just VentureBeat is not sufficient for an article. Additionally, the wording is overly promotional. IceWelder  &#91; &#9993; &#93; 08:44, 23 November 2021 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.