Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Zed (Kiba)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   merge to List of Kiba characters. ··· 日本穣 ? · Talk to Nihonjoe 04:52, 30 September 2008 (UTC)

Zed (Kiba)

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

This character does not establish notability independent of its series. Without coverage in reliable third party sources, it is just made up of unnecessary plot summary and original research. TTN (talk) 16:56, 25 September 2008 (UTC)


 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Anime and manga-related deletion discussions.   --  treelo  radda  18:18, 25 September 2008 (UTC)


 * Note: See also Articles for deletion/Noa (Kiba). Mango juice talk 03:30, 26 September 2008 (UTC)


 * Merge per common consensus, WP:BEFORE, and the advice of WP:FICT to List of Kiba characters. A quick search finds no sign of independent notability, so the S.O.P. is merge it up. —Quasirandom (talk) 18:32, 25 September 2008 (UTC)


 * Merge to list per the usual reasoning. --erachima talk 19:09, 25 September 2008 (UTC)


 * Merge, not to the list, but to Kiba (anime). This is apparently the main character of the series, and should be discussed in greater detail on the main page.  I can do this merge if it is accepted.  Mango juice talk 03:30, 26 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Actually, the content should be both places: a fuller version in the list, a summary thereof in the main article. By my understanding, given GDFL issues and common sense, that'd make the list the appropriate target. —Quasirandom (talk) 14:31, 26 September 2008 (UTC) —Preceding unsigned comment added by Quasirandom (talk • contribs)
 * There is already a brief entry in the list on Zed. Mango juice talk 17:23, 26 September 2008 (UTC)


 * Merge using some of the content to expand the entry on the list, and whether in the main article or a separate list is detail. Not plot summary, for I cant actually figure out the main plot from the present article,which is, indeed, about as low in usefullness as it gets around here. I'd support keeping separate articles on main characters, but only if they;re done with some degree of competence, and for clearly major fictions. DGG (talk) 01:25, 27 September 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.