Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Zeddust


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was merge and redirect to Totalise Plc v Motley Fool Ltd. Proto   ||    type    13:23, 23 May 2006 (UTC)

Zeddust
Non-notable. If anything, the case is notable, not the party to it. cj | talk 04:44, 10 May 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom Keep case delete this article.--Nick Y. 05:41, 10 May 2006 (UTC)


 * I think the case is very notable, there is no "if anything" about it. Supposed 06:10, 10 May 2006 (UTC)
 * comment - Supposed, it is suggested that those editing an article disclose their involvement during AfD discussions. In any case, I started the case article. --Chaser 06:39, 10 May 2006 (UTC)


 * Keep as party to the first case of internet libel in the UK or at the very least merge to Totalise Plc v Motley Fool Ltd and use as a redirect. Tyrenius 06:50, 10 May 2006 (UTC)
 * Merge and Redirect to Totalise Plc v Motley Fool Ltd. The case is notable, but I doubt an article about the username could be developed beyond what should be covered in the case article. ScottW 14:08, 10 May 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom Runcorn 20:02, 15 May 2006 (UTC)

''This AfD is being relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached. Please add new discussion below this notice. Thanks!'' Deathphoenix ʕ 14:45, 16 May 2006 (UTC)
 * Merge and Redirect per ScottW. RGTraynor 16:30, 16 May 2006 (UTC)
 * Merge and Redirect to Totalise Plc v Motley Fool Ltd. Expand Totalise Plc v Motley Fool Ltd. It needs all the help it can get. :) Dlohcierekim 17:06, 16 May 2006 (UTC)
 * Merge and Redirect per above. TheMadBaron 19:20, 17 May 2006 (UTC)
 * Merge and Redirect - per ScottW. Zaxem 11:56, 22 May 2006 (UTC)
 * Closure, please I merged what little content there was. I think we're ready for closure and page redirect or deletion if someone who is not involved would like to do so. --Chaser (T, C, e) 09:20, 23 May 2006 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.