Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Zee Nung


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Zee Entertainment Enterprises. (non-admin closure) ansh 666 01:29, 2 August 2016 (UTC)

Zee Nung

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

The article shows no evidence of notability, and is untouched in terms of actual content since its original upload, save for the tags added by myself and User:Edward321. The article is also very poorly written, and it seems like it was simply pasted from Google Translate. GammaRadiator (talk) 20:54, 29 June 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. GSS  (talk) 11:54, 30 June 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Thailand-related deletion discussions. GSS  (talk) 11:54, 30 June 2016 (UTC)


 * Weak keep. Press coverage is there, suggesting the subject passes the GNG. --Paul_012 (talk) 12:59, 4 July 2016 (UTC)
 * Maybe so, but it appears to be from an affiliate member of the ZEE group. Therefore, it is self advertising and is ineligable as a source.GammaRadiator (talk) 00:11, 7 July 2016 (UTC)
 * I guess you mean the articles read like advertorials? They aren't noted as such, though. --Paul_012 (talk) 07:28, 7 July 2016 (UTC)
 * No. Source 1 (ZEE News) has only a passing reference to ZEE Nung, instead focusing on ZEE Sine, a ZEE franchise in the Phillipines whereas Nung broadcasts in Thailand. The second source links to another unrelated article discussing one of ZEE Living's (NOT ZEE Nung) presenters being nominated for an Emmy. Because both articles are unrelated to ZEE Nung itself, there are no apparent sources and it therefore fails to meet GNGs. GammaRadiator (talk) 12:10, 7 July 2016 (UTC)
 * Oh. I thought you were referring to the Bangkok Post and The Nation articles I gave above. My comment wasn't referring to any of the refs currently used in the article. --Paul_012 (talk) 16:56, 7 July 2016 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 01:44, 6 July 2016 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Spirit of Eagle (talk) 02:27, 13 July 2016 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus. Relisting comment: final relist &mdash; Music1201  talk  17:45, 20 July 2016 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, &mdash; Music1201  talk  17:45, 20 July 2016 (UTC)
 * Redirect to Zee Entertainment Enterprises I found an article to show that it "exists". But there is no significant coverage about the channel itself (also it fails WP:CORPDEPTH by a huge margin). More importantly, I found that the channel doesn't have its own original programming but is simply replaying popular Indian programmes owned by the network's other popular channels like Zee TV. Since it doesn't have its own programming, I would say redirect it to the parent organisation per WP:NMEDIA --Lemongirl942 (talk) 05:07, 22 July 2016 (UTC)
 * That seems sensible. Either way, Nung is definitely not worthy of its own article. GammaRadiator (talk) 20:24, 23 July 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.