Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Zeenat Bi


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Michig (talk) 07:08, 10 December 2018 (UTC)

Zeenat Bi

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Non notable longevity claim. The lack of sources says it all, it's a wonder this has been around so long. WP:NOPAGE The Blade of the Northern Lights ( 話して下さい ) 02:20, 3 December 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions.   C Thomas3   (talk) 05:36, 3 December 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions.   C Thomas3   (talk) 05:36, 3 December 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions.   C Thomas3   (talk) 05:36, 3 December 2018 (UTC)


 * Delete "Zeenat Bi has Government pension records stating she is 101 - but she insists she is twelve years older." says it all. Interesting that did not make it into this article. Legacypac (talk) 07:04, 3 December 2018 (UTC)
 * Delete There's only a smattering of sources that popped up in 2012 and a couple after that. Not notable. Gargleafg (talk) 08:19, 3 December 2018 (UTC)
 * Delete – Ridiculous yet funny. Obviously fails GNG or ANYBIO. — JFG talk 08:28, 3 December 2018 (UTC)
 * Delete This article is a complete joke that fails WP:GNG or WP:ANYBIO. Newshunter12 (talk) 08:49, 3 December 2018 (UTC)
 * Delete per all of the above Spiderone  19:19, 6 December 2018 (UTC)
 * Delete true problems with sourcing the claim, and even if true not enough to make notable.John Pack Lambert (talk) 06:10, 9 December 2018 (UTC)
 * Delete - One of those who were known only for claiming themselves to be oldest or very old. These subjects lack significant coverage especially when we take their extraordinary claims into account. This is similar to other recently nominated articles. Rzvas (talk) 07:06, 9 December 2018 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.