Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Zeera P. Charnoe (Zee Charnoe)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Courcelles 01:37, 2 January 2011 (UTC)

Zeera P. Charnoe (Zee Charnoe)
AfDs for this article: 


 * – ( View AfD View log )

A number of issues with this article:

Notability: I am having a hard time establishing notability for this person.

Possible Author COI: Article's main contributor is, listing the same last name as the subject.

Sourcing: Many of the sources are not acceptable, or do not establish notability. (Note that the sources are not properly inlined but instead linked as ELs with numbers inserted into the text, this is fixable of course.) Many of them are to a Google Docs account with the name "Jennifer Gray" who I assume is S. Jennifer Gray Charnoe here on WP. If so, I believe this is an unacceptable self-published source. On notability, other sources only seem to mention this person giving talks at some event, or being listed on a patent. OSbornarfcontributionatoration 03:11, 26 December 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions.  -- OSbornarfcontributionatoration 03:11, 26 December 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete Zero hits on gnews. Everything that comes up elsewhere is an SPS.  The article is also a complete mess. Aside, something is broken on this AfD or somewhere else because the AfD is redlinked for me on the article page, but still leads here.  Sailsbystars (talk) 16:10, 26 December 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete. Tried searching for a few of the things that this person might be notable, but I'm not finding anything other than hits on this page and other wiki mirrors. Chris Neville-Smith (talk) 17:40, 26 December 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Science-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 22:46, 26 December 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 22:47, 26 December 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 22:47, 26 December 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete and salt. Negligible sources. Xxanthippe (talk) 23:22, 26 December 2010 (UTC).
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Ireland-related deletion discussions.  —Snappy (talk) 17:48, 29 December 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete - Not notable, fails WP:GNG. Possible vanity/puff piece. Snappy (talk) 17:53, 29 December 2010 (UTC)
 * Comment - If consensus it to delete, then due to this being the 3rd AfD, I recommendend creation protection as per WP:SALT. Snappy (talk) 17:09, 31 December 2010 (UTC)
 * Comment - Actually, given that each recreation has been under a different name, salting would likely be ineffective. Leaving it unsalted would make it easier a patrolling admin to know to CSD:G4 the page.  Sailsbystars (talk) 21:55, 31 December 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete. Not verifiable. This is the third AfD, by the way. She doesn't give up. Also see the same editor's articles Harbinger Community and Celestial Synapse, which need attention. Fences  &amp;  Windows  22:03, 30 December 2010 (UTC)
 * Oooh, look! I verified something. He knew Leonard Cohen in the 70s. (I think it's Leonard Cohen). Fences  &amp;  Windows  22:16, 30 December 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete. Fails WP:BK.  Not sure how he's supposed to be a "notable" author.  He appears to be nothing more than a multiple hobbyist with non-notable interests in a lot of different areas.  Also, should have been speedied, due to the two previous deletions at AfD.  Qworty (talk) 00:04, 31 December 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.