Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Zeera Polyandre Charnoe

 This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or on a Votes for Undeletion nomination). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete. Woohookitty 08:09, 15 July 2005 (UTC)

Zeera Polyandre Charnoe
0 google hits (scholar and print included). This is not the best test for notability but with its horrible formatting it looks either vanity or made up. If it is by some chance notable then hopefully this VfD will produce references for the article. gren 7 July 2005 04:31 (UTC)
 * Delete - Looks like nonsense to me. Tried various Google searches and found nothing relevant. TheMidnighters 7 July 2005 05:56 (UTC)
 * Delete Changed to Keep non-notable/not-verifiable. I noticed that the article now states the source as his wife and student.  If external and verifiable sources can be provided, then I'd consider changing my vote.  As it currently stands, though, I think removing the article is the right thing to do.  I've reviewed the sources now listed on the talk page and am satisfied that this is a real person with real accomplishments.  I note that this person holds patents in Canada, the United States, and Europe.  I also note that the author has provided satisfactory sources to justify a keep, in my opinion.  Though many of the sources are not online, I think we have to be careful about deleting content that lacks online reference.  There's lots of information out there that has not yet landed on the Internet so we must be mindful not to toss stuff simply because we cannot quickly validate it with google.  Since the publications and patents are now verified, I think we should keep and let this article grow and mature.  Updated: Tobycat 05:41, 12 July 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete unverifiable. JamesBurns 7 July 2005 07:51 (UTC)
 * Delete: Like above. —ArmadniGeneral 7 July 2005 17:07 (UTC)
 * Delete: A person is involved in that ridiculously large amount of subjects and still gets zero Google hits? Oh please, that's a hoax. --IByte 7 July 2005 18:52 (UTC)
 * Oh, here's a misdirected cry for help on the creating user's talk page. How about asking her for some solid references? (Which obviously excludes "because I say it's true") Note that I currently see no reason to change my vote. --IByte 23:23, 9 July 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep: I will change to keep because of the patent information. The article needs a lot of help and to be sourced, but, I am not sure if it meets most people's sense of notability but it's enough that if I had seen the patents before I wouldn't have put up for VfD gren 05:49, 12 July 2005 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in an undeletion request). No further edits should be made to this page.