Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/ZeiraCorp


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   merge to Terminator: The Sarah Connor Chronicles. \ Backslash Forwardslash / {talk} 23:42, 1 August 2009 (UTC)

ZeiraCorp

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Delete - no reliable sources establish any notability for this fictional company. Otto4711 (talk) 10:03, 25 July 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions.  -- – Juliancolton  &#124; Talk 15:54, 25 July 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions.  -- – Juliancolton  &#124; Talk 15:54, 25 July 2009 (UTC)
 * Weak Delete - The franchise this fictional company is part of has quite a large cultural impact but there's nothing to say how this particular facet of the story influences the Terminator's real world impact. PanydThe muffin is not subtle 18:38, 25 July 2009 (UTC)
 * delete Inappropriate. Jack Merridew 04:10, 26 July 2009 (UTC)
 * Merge to the TV series article, as ZeiraCorp is central to the second season. 76.66.192.64 (talk) 06:38, 26 July 2009 (UTC)
 * Merge to Terminator: The Sarah Connor Chronicles, total absence of any other usage of this term means it will be a clean redirect once merged. Abductive (talk) 07:03, 27 July 2009 (UTC)
 * Merge to Terminator: The Sarah Connor Chronicles. Artemis84 (talk) 17:44, 27 July 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep or merge as last resort standard fictional entry that is verifiable and notable, its seems too big to merge into the main article. --Richard Arthur Norton (1958- ) (talk) 19:28, 28 July 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep Richard Arthur Norton makes a convincing point. It seems like a standard fictional entry, and it is verifiable, and a notable aspect of the notable series.  You gain nothing by destroying it, the wikipedia isn't running out of space.   D r e a m Focus  10:49, 29 July 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep or merge as last resort pretty major plot theme for the show, and article is getting pretty hefty as is. There should be some commentary that might come from some print media not available online. Casliber (talk · contribs) 04:49, 30 July 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete. The article consists solely of plot supported only by primary sources (and one second-hand). Furthermore, reading the "references" section finds a collection of original research and editor interpretation.  Fails the Verifiability policy, the general Notability guideline, and the policy on No original research.  —   pd_THOR  undefined | 06:27, 30 July 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete - Withdrawn at the point we find some reliable source outside of a mere mention by someone parroting the whole Terminator franchise. Not every random corporation referenced in a work of fiction, even if popular, is notable. Shadowjams (talk) 09:09, 31 July 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.