Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Zelda's Sweet Shoppe


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   Delete. Eluchil404 (talk) 04:43, 20 April 2015 (UTC)

Zelda's Sweet Shoppe

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Non-notable Illinois bakery, minimal WP:CORPDEPTH, tagged for notability for almost 7 years so it's probably well past time to discuss this. Fisheriesmgmt (talk) 20:53, 12 April 2015 (UTC)
 * Strong Delete. Cheap promo article. Educationtemple (talk) 21:01, 12 April 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete: fails WP:GNG, no coverage in reliable sources. Esquivalience t 23:32, 12 April 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Food and drink-related deletion discussions. North America1000 23:54, 12 April 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. North America1000 23:54, 12 April 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Illinois-related deletion discussions. North America1000 23:55, 12 April 2015 (UTC)


 * Delete – Does not meet WP:N. Some coverage exists, such as, , but not finding significant coverage. North America1000 23:57, 12 April 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete as fails GNG. – Davey 2010 Talk 02:06, 13 April 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete fails GNG and N.--TonyTheTiger (T / C / WP:FOUR / WP:CHICAGO / WP:WAWARD) 06:02, 14 April 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete Fails WP:GNG.Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 09:46, 14 April 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete I suggest the best thing for this content would be to list the shoppe in WikiVoyage, it sounds like a cool place. Bryce Carmony (talk) 01:00, 15 April 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete, fails all of the relevant notability guidelines.  Kharkiv07 Talk  21:42, 19 April 2015 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.