Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Zelda Classic


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was delete. Sr13 01:08, 12 June 2007 (UTC)

Zelda Classic

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

Fails WP:OR, WP:RS --TheSeer (TalkˑContribs) 13:02, 7 June 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete, per nom & WP:Notability --Javit 13:06, 7 June 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete. No good third-party sources. ' 13:18, 7 June 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete per notability and reliable sources. Carlosguitar 14:17, 7 June 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom and WP:CRYSTAL for the final section.  Plm  209 ( talk to me • contribs ) 15:08, 7 June 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep Certainly passes nobility as "Results 1 - 10 of about 1,610,000 for Zelda Classic" says Google. 1610000 is enough. Passes WP:NOR as references are cited. Passes WP:RS as references seem reliable. W1k13rh3nry 22:17, 7 June 2007 (UTC)
 * You should be searching for Zelda Classic within quotes (112,000) results, without the quotes pages calling Zelda a classic would appear. More importantly the article doesn't have any references (3 external links don't really count), people who patrol AFDs do check the article and simply stating it has references won't work. --TheSeer (TalkˑContribs) 00:51, 8 June 2007 (UTC)
 * Comment: also, google show IGN article as result of "Zelda Classic" which is not related to this article. Please reveiw your position. Carlosguitar 12:53, 8 June 2007 (UTC)


 * Delete, does not appear to be sufficiently notable. Andre (talk) 00:47, 8 June 2007 (UTC)
 * Redirect to The Legend of Zelda, as it might refer to the original NES version, and not a remake of the original NES game Zelda 1. 132.205.44.134 02:57, 8 June 2007 (UTC)
 * I have never heard anybody refer to the original Zelda as "Zelda Classic". - furrykef (Talk at me) 04:52, 9 June 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete, doesn't seem to be notable. --Toxicroak 15:22, 8 June 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. - furrykef (Talk at me) 04:52, 9 June 2007 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.