Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Zen (2007 film)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. Ron Ritzman (talk) 01:28, 8 November 2011 (UTC)

Zen (2007 film)

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Does not appear to meet the criteria at WP:NFILM. Has not won any major awards or received significant coverage in reliable secondary sources. / ƒETCH COMMS  /  04:20, 25 October 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 13:58, 25 October 2011 (UTC)


 * Delete as failing WP:NF. This might be a released and screened film but, away from being verifiable as existing, it has not received commentary or review in reliable secindary sources. Sometimes a film simply does not have the sourcable notability we require.  Schmidt,  MICHAEL Q. 22:39, 25 October 2011 (UTC) (Struck, See below)  Schmidt,  MICHAEL Q. 08:29, 1 November 2011 (UTC)


 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, The Bushranger One ping only 05:28, 1 November 2011 (UTC)


 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Florida-related deletion discussions. The Bushranger One ping only 05:30, 1 November 2011 (UTC)


 *  Weak keep - Very weak. I've cleaned up the article a bit, cleared out the cruft in external links, referenced, and added information about the 2009 sequel(!). However I can't find a single actual review of the film. It obviously fails WP:NFILM's "other evidence of notability" section; the first part obviously, and the second part, #2, based on the fact that DeZolt just had his own article deleted for lack of notability. As for defaulting to the WP:GNG, however, it has been mentioned in the film section of a nationally prominent newspaper (the South Florida Sun-Sentinel), with regards to it being made by a prominent local filmmaker, but ... - The Bushranger One ping only 06:00, 1 November 2011 (UTC)
 * Keep Per the expansion work done by Bushranger.  Lugnuts  (talk) 07:47, 1 November 2011 (UTC)
 * Keep per improvements made. I never mind being proven wrong. Big kudos to The Bushranger. Nice job!  Schmidt,  MICHAEL Q. 08:29, 1 November 2011 (UTC)
 * Keep per The Bushranger's additions; subject meets WP:NFILM.  Gongshow  Talk 03:48, 2 November 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.