Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Zenarae Antoine


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure)  Arun Kumar SINGH (Talk)  05:55, 6 October 2016 (UTC)

Zenarae Antoine

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Supported by only one reference, which is not independent. Does not appear to meet general notability guidelines. Robert McClenon (talk) 03:20, 27 September 2016 (UTC)
 * Keep Even though the article could use some work and needs to fit the format of similar articles, there is ample precedent for current D1 women's basketball coaches of mid-major teams having articles:  Jhn31 (talk) 04:35, 27 September 2016 (UTC)
 * Template:Southland Conference women's basketball coach navbox
 * Template:Horizon League women's basketball coach navbox
 * Template:Mid-American Conference women's basketball coach navbox
 * Template:Ohio Valley Conference women's basketball coach navbox


 * Keep Per Jhn31. Division I basketball coaches, men's or women's, are notable. Smartyllama (talk) 12:34, 29 September 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 14:27, 30 September 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Texas-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 14:27, 30 September 2016 (UTC)


 * Comment, added women project to article talkpage so participants are notified of afd.
 * Keep Ok, the article is a disaster. Many, many issues.  But article quality (or length for that matter) is not a determiner of notability.  Women's college basketball is a major sport in the US.  Did a sniff test and in very short order found these, , and .  GNG is met, so keep. RonSigPi (talk) 03:45, 3 October 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.