Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Zenith Insurance Company


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. North America1000 00:23, 29 June 2015 (UTC)

Zenith Insurance Company

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Nonnotable. No independent sources, only press-releases or company webpages Staszek Lem (talk) 23:32, 7 June 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions.  lavender |(formerly HMSSolent )| lambast  00:05, 8 June 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions.  lavender |(formerly HMSSolent )| lambast  00:05, 8 June 2015 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Keep - or at the very least redirect to Fairfax Financial. I'm seeing coverage (albeit not necessarily in great depth) over the years in books, magazines, and newspapers, e.g.:  . Seems enough to me to meet the WP:GNG. Page will certainly need a large cleanup if kept. mikeman67 (talk) 16:25, 8 June 2015 (UTC)
 * Of course this kind of business has lots of advertising and press-releases. WP:GNG requires independent in-depth coverage, not just PR babble. Staszek Lem (talk) 16:29, 8 June 2015 (UTC)
 * I don't believe I've linked to any press releases or advertising. There's also the Toronto Star/Canadian Press and Bloomberg: . Seems to me there's enough coverage to meet WP:CORPDEPTH. mikeman67 (talk) 16:38, 8 June 2015 (UTC)
 * Comment - I've edited the page and removed a lot of the advertising from the page, and added in some sources. mikeman67 (talk) 17:18, 8 June 2015 (UTC)
 * Maybe move to Fairfax Financial for now - I wasn't sure because the article is neat and sourced now but I'm doubtful of solid notability and my searches (such as this and this with the same results at Books) found nothing outstanding aside from one press release. SwisterTwister   talk  04:45, 10 June 2015 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 14:24, 14 June 2015 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 09:58, 21 June 2015 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.