Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Zeoke (Lučani)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 22:00, 2 March 2021 (UTC)

Zeoke (Lučani)

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Non-notable MEisSCAMMER(talk)Hello! 18:14, 23 February 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Serbia-related deletion discussions. MEisSCAMMER(talk)Hello!  18:14, 23 February 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Geography-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 18:17, 23 February 2021 (UTC)


 * Keep - a village reporting a population in a national census meets WP:GEOLAND for me. Hog Farm Talk 18:33, 23 February 2021 (UTC)
 * But the source says it's from 2003 -- it's outdated. There would have been a more recent census if it was still notable. MEisSCAMMER(talk)Hello! 21:05, 23 February 2021 (UTC)
 * Even if it is no longer populated (which doesn't seem likely), WP:GEOLAND also applies to formerly populated places. See also WP:NTEMP - if a subject gains notability, it will still be notable, even if the conditions that gave it notability are no longer present (like retired athletes). Hog Farm Talk 22:05, 23 February 2021 (UTC)


 * Speedy keep per WP:GEOLAND. I notice you are new here, but please familiarize yourself with the maze of our deletion criteria before venturing into nominating articles for deletion. You're wasting everyone's time on this discussion: populated places of almost any kind are routinely kept despite notability, article quality and sourcing. No such user (talk) 21:30, 23 February 2021 (UTC)
 * Keep. Meets WP:GEOLAND ("Populated, legally recognized places are typically presumed to be notable, even if their population is very low."). ✍A.WagnerC (talk) 04:50, 24 February 2021 (UTC)
 * Keep per all (except nom) above. Legally recognized population center.  Even if the national census was from 1903, or 1803 or whenever, it's still notable. Oakshade (talk) 06:37, 24 February 2021 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.